반응형
Foucault tells us that ~
We are far indeed from A
For Foucault,
It is surprising that ~
Foucault account in book's name
His analysis as a whole reproduces that ~
In what follows, I shall examine ~
I consider three categories of such ~
I shall probe ~
In the final section, I shall argue
All the A we have described so far are ~
We have examined some of ~
In a language of ~
Are we dealing in all this merely with A?
Both are aiming at the same general result.
We are often told that ~
There is some truth in A.
Here it might be objected that ~
First, Second, Third, Lastly(Finally)
As I argued earlier,
It is true that ~
What is announced in A
Foucault tends to identify A
Now,
This is not to deny that ~
What I wish to suggest instead is that ~
As noted earlier,
I have described elsewhere how ~
This, then, is one meaning of A
This is a second sense of A
There is a certain contradiction here.
beyond this, it calls into question that ~
If my analysis is correct,
If, as I have argued, ~
By contrast,
In important ways,
It is presented to us in ways that ~
Foucault often writes
Peter accuses Foucault of lacking a theory of A
Nor should we forget that ~
I will argue ~
What I need to ask of why ~
We need to ~
I will call those stream as ~
I agree with A
I take ~
For that reason,
throughout my discussion
This is not to say that ~
Nowhere, as we shall see, is this more clear than in the case of A.
This is what many anorexics describe as their ultimate goal.
It is not usually noted that ~
A hundred pages earlier, she had described ~
We should feel cautioned against ~
Surely we must recognize in this last ~
None of this is to dispute that ~
There is the same emphasis on ~
Most strikingly, there is the same emphasis on ~
Hilde reports that ~
What is the meaning of these ~?
It was an era, too, that ~
Freud, who~
Paradoxically,
It is important to recognize, too, that ~
Let's explore this image.
It is important to emphasize that ~
A, on the other hand, ~
We are far indeed from A
For Foucault,
It is surprising that ~
Foucault account in book's name
His analysis as a whole reproduces that ~
In what follows, I shall examine ~
I consider three categories of such ~
I shall probe ~
In the final section, I shall argue
All the A we have described so far are ~
We have examined some of ~
In a language of ~
Are we dealing in all this merely with A?
Both are aiming at the same general result.
We are often told that ~
There is some truth in A.
Here it might be objected that ~
First, Second, Third, Lastly(Finally)
As I argued earlier,
It is true that ~
What is announced in A
Foucault tends to identify A
Now,
This is not to deny that ~
What I wish to suggest instead is that ~
As noted earlier,
I have described elsewhere how ~
This, then, is one meaning of A
This is a second sense of A
There is a certain contradiction here.
beyond this, it calls into question that ~
If my analysis is correct,
If, as I have argued, ~
By contrast,
In important ways,
It is presented to us in ways that ~
Foucault often writes
Peter accuses Foucault of lacking a theory of A
Nor should we forget that ~
I will argue ~
What I need to ask of why ~
We need to ~
I will call those stream as ~
I agree with A
I take ~
For that reason,
throughout my discussion
This is not to say that ~
Nowhere, as we shall see, is this more clear than in the case of A.
This is what many anorexics describe as their ultimate goal.
It is not usually noted that ~
A hundred pages earlier, she had described ~
We should feel cautioned against ~
Surely we must recognize in this last ~
None of this is to dispute that ~
There is the same emphasis on ~
Most strikingly, there is the same emphasis on ~
Hilde reports that ~
What is the meaning of these ~?
It was an era, too, that ~
Freud, who~
Paradoxically,
It is important to recognize, too, that ~
Let's explore this image.
It is important to emphasize that ~
A, on the other hand, ~
반응형